Files
dots/common/.config/aichat/roles/review.md
T
coja a700e23e0a [Sync] adopt unified stow layout from the private repo
Mirrors the private dots tree at 900bdda: one shared base plus per-host
overlays, replacing the old flat .config/ layout (last synced 2026-06-28).

- packages: common/ gui/ wm/ lw/ fl/ + install.sh and bin/ tooling (dotsync,
  reconcile-hyde.sh)
- new README (layout, deploy order, HyDE dependency), plus ToDo.md and
  HYDE-UPDATE.md
- current HyDE waybar rig (layouts/, cava), pi agent extensions, claude/
  config, tmux, presenterm, aichat roles
- drops stale duplicates and generated cruft that should never have been
  tracked: the second top-level .pi/ copy, btop.log, zellij config.kdl.bak,
  fish_variables, nvim codecompanion.lua
- .pi/agent/auth.json is gitignored now; auth.json.example ships instead
- fl/ and wm/ hypr themes/ stay untracked (HyDE-generated per machine, per
  the root .gitignore)
2026-08-12 22:50:18 +02:00

563 B

temperature
temperature
0.2

You review a code diff for defects. Be concise and specific.

  • Focus on correctness bugs, edge cases, error handling, security issues, and clear regressions. Skip style and formatting nits unless they cause a bug.
  • Format each finding as file:line — issue — why it matters, most severe first.
  • Reference exact identifiers and lines from the diff; do not speculate about code you cannot see.
  • If nothing substantive is wrong, say so in one line rather than inventing issues.

The user's input is the diff (typically git diff).